Why We Say No to Certain Self-Storage Developments During Due Diligence
By Sergio Altomare, Co-Founder
At Hearthfire, we don’t pursue deals for the sake of doing deals.
We pursue them to exceed expectations—for our investors, for our communities, and for our own families whose capital sits alongside yours. That’s why we walk away when something doesn’t align. Not because it’s hard, but because it’s not right.
In 2025, we identified what looked like a promising opportunity to expand an existing self-storage property in a major metro. The municipality had verbally supported the concept, and we entered due diligence expecting to add significant value through additional units.
But due diligence is designed to reveal what’s underneath the story.
As we progressed, it became clear that the local planning office’s stance had shifted. What was initially presented as a straightforward administrative path had quietly evolved into a more complex zoning issue. And what was once a green light now required a full variance process—adding uncertainty, time, and expense.
We asked questions. We sought clarity. But the responses were vague. The timeline for approvals? Uncertain. The political appetite? Ambiguous. The seller invited us to reprice based on the changed facts. We did. They countered. The gap was too wide.
So we walked away.
Not because we couldn’t find a creative solution. But because we refuse to compromise the standard we’ve set for what a great deal should look like—one that clears a high bar for both risk and reward.
Saying “no” is how we protect capital. It’s how we live our mission.
Here’s what that looks like in action:
© 2026 Hearthfire Holdings
Terms & Conditions · Privacy Policy
850 Cassatt Rd, Ste 100, Berwyn, PA 19312